The Federal government calls it a ‘Human Services Access Card’
We call it for what it is: a National ID Card System
Frequently Asked Question No. 6
What does the Federal Privacy Commissioner say about it?
Submission re the first Access Card Bill – January 2007 – rather bureaucratic in style, and government-friendly, but it does identify some of the serious deficiencies with the Bill
Media Release 8 November 2006: a pleasant and positive response, even though “the Taskforce and the Government have not taken up all of my recommendations … I am committed to working constructively with the Government”
Media Release 25 August 2006: “recommended a range of privacy safeguards be developed for the proposed health and social services access card”, in this submission to the Task Force
Media Release 26 April 2006: “it is essential that appropriate privacy protections are built in early, particularly into the system design of the access card and registration process, rather than trying to ‘bolt’ these on later. … I encourage the Government to give close consideration to privacy issues and undertake privacy impact assessments as the proposal is progressed”
The Privacy Commissioner is not a watchdog for the public interest. Rather:
- the Privacy Commissioner is merely the administrator of one particular statute
- that statute was weak in 1988
- that statute has been progressively weakened over the years, as agencies have arranged ever more exemptions and exceptions for themselves
- the Privacy Commissioner is not funded by the Parliament, but by the single person in the Government that most need to be controlled – the Attorney-General
- unless the Privacy Commissioner is seen by the Attorney-General to be of good behaviour, funding and re-appointment can be, and is, withheld
So don’t expect any dramatic pro-privacy stances from the Privacy Commissioner.
If you are aware of errors or omissions in this document, please let us know.
Go back to the previous FAQ Go to the next FAQ